A lovely aesthetic, but definitely one to be controlled rather than allowed to get out of hand. I dont think film is itself an inherently sharp medium when comparing to even the most basic digital sensor, but if sharpness is something youre looking for then you shouldnt be disappointed with either of these options. Not being concerned with grain and underexposure, I didnt mind it. 1. Id like to be able to shoot 400 speed films either dead on as much as possible, and to use the latitude when in tricky situations to go slightly under when necessary. Thank you! My conclusion is that in comparison between two box speed 400 films the Kentmere wins outright. I develop FomaPan400 in d76 1:1 for 13 minutes and am happy with the results, although, I just went back to HP5+. Was ich nun suche ist ein Film der bei 400/24 oder etwas weniger gut mit Rodinal harmorniert. Its cheaper than tri-x and hp5+. Zu teuer ist er auch nicht: im 10er-Pack 4,39 bei Fotoimpex. If I could only have one it would be the Ilford for its bulletproof reliability. However I really wanted to get better negatives. I recently wrote a 5 Frames With Fomapan 400 where I described the results shot at EI1600 with a 2 stop push. I only used three cassettes of Fomapan 400 in 135 because shot outside I found it quite grainyhowever shots I made indoors under low light in a church and a museum looked really good. I disagree that Fomapan 400 is garbage, but it is very different to HP5+. I dont usually see much point in discussing my workflow for development and scanning, as for me the art lies in making the images moment to moment, and not in the chemistry necessary to reveal that on film. Easy to introduce texture in those areas in a print just by flashing the paper beforehand, if that is something that perticularly worried anyone who doesnt want any areas of pure white on their image. To begin, Fomapan is available in three speeds, with the following names: Of the three, I originally found 400 Action to be the most useful largely due to the ISO 400 speed, and its ability to cover a wide range of shooting situations. However the overall effect is actually quite muddy, and unpleasing to my eye, whereas the Fomapan in the same condition is undeniably less detailed, but results in a nicer image (in my opinion).if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[336,280],'35mmc_com-box-4','ezslot_11',182,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-4-0'); Kentmere 400, exposed for the dappled light. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere. Maybe it likes really high contrast scenes to begin with.though in 120 it is a nice film as the grain just isn't so noticeable. Fantastic review!Thank you for sharing these shots and your thoughts and observations. Film Comparison: Kentmere 400 Vs Fomapan 400. But HP5 Plus offers something different than Tri-X - stronger in Atomal49 1+2 kam er noch differentierter und mit schnen Grauwerten. And believe me, they are crummy. I've managed to tame it a bit with homemade Microdol 1:3 BTW Although development is slow, like 25-30 minutes at 75F with 30 second agitation. If Fomas QC were that good, then Id rather have the Foma. I no longer have to cross my fingers hoping that the negatives will come out. These days, I primarily shoot 100 Classic, in large part because I use Fomapan a great deal in the testing of vintage cameras Ive repaired or restored, and their limited shutter speeds and apertures make it difficult to properly expose on a bright, sunny day with fast ISO 400 film. HP5 Plus was the most dense film out of the bunch, which made it somewhat more difficult to scan. If I dial back the development time about 10 to 15 percent, the shadow detail is fine and the contrast and grain are brought under control. Thank you Marius! For example a roll of medium format will cost you less than 5$. November 20, 2019. Thank you! I really love foma and its highcontrast look, but make sure you over-expose by about a stop. Ive found that when scanning, especially if youre using something like an Epson V600, it can be very difficult to recover highlights from Tri-X without throwing off the whole image. I highly recommend you check it out here. When shot with different exposures in mind, in different kinds of conditions, these films can produce quite a few looks. I think the character of these films are the elements that remain consistent through most use cases. schrfe war nie ein Problem. Is that the new Jane Bond? Noticeable halation. Id say that Fomapan 400 is fairly low grain, but largegrained very visible, but not bad to my eye. Lets talk grain. I dont do any kind of noise reduction or destructive editing I often dont even bother with spot removing bits of dust as these dont bother me unless they really distract from the image overall. Here are a few examples of shots Ive taken with Fomapan 400 Action, 200 Creative, and 100 Classic. Really glad you found it useful! Hopefully the results above prove me right. Clocking in at $5.19 a roll for 36 exposures as of October 2021, this is the lest expensive film I shot for this comparison. APX is the opposite and pushes very well. Yes, in that case you would be cutting into the film speed a bit, but you could still get more of the look you like while shooting the film you prefer. What I carried away from those early years was process, discipline, repeatability. Ich mchte einen klassischen Film verwenden, die Tmax und Deltas fallen also raus. For more articles on 35mmc about the subject matter discussed here, please click one of the following tag links: Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience. An update here. Its predictable, and has a very classic feeling to it. Most of my serious stuff I would not use 35mm for. Ive even shot the movie at a World War 1 event at Torontos historic Fort York, and it looked amazing, especially when I framed the images right to avoid the modern condos surrounding the fort today. 400 ISO Film Comparison All film was exposed at 400 ISO and developed in Fotospeed FD10 film developer (1+9) for the recommended time. HP5 habe ich unter diesem Handelsnamen nie verwendet, aber als Kentmere400 wird wohl eine recht hnliche Emulsion angeboten. I developed both films with rodinol, so a good deal of grain was to be expected. I really disliked Fomapan 400. Thank you Victor! But HP5 Plus offers something different than Tri-X - stronger contrast and what I think is less pronounced grain, especially in the skies. I think again the Kentmere has more detail here, less lost in the shadows and better definition in the highlights. end of the spectrum compared to Ilford and Kodak offerings, but also because I think it performs better than its price point. I tried Foma 400 and to be honest, I am not happy with it. One word of caution when scanning Kentmere films with flatbed scanners like the Epson V600 or V800 - be very careful with the Unsharp Mask. Simply register for free here We are always happy to welcome new members! Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience-, 5 Frames with the Olympus XA & Ektar 100 (at EI400) by Simon King, Frames with the Mighty Hasselblad XPAN By Yul Vazquez, 5 Frames on Frozen Lake Winnipeg with Rollei 25 RPX By Christopf Rampitsch, 5 Frames With Fomapan 400 "Action" at EI1600, Developed as 3200 - by Simon King - 35mmc, First Impressions: A Fomapan 400 Review - The Analogue Experience, Fomapan 400 & Kentmere 400 Review - Battle of the Budgets - by Simon King - 35mmc, Video: Chatting to Ashley Carr in Stourport (part 2), 5 frames of the Extinction Rebellion with a Leica R5 - by Michael Scott, Camera, Lens, Film and Peripheral Kit Reviews, Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience. Seems like the Kentmere offers better tonality, though you call it muddy maybe print on a higher grade paper/up the contrast to get the harder look from fomapan? Ive experimented with Foma quite a bit to get results that I feel represent the best possible look from this film. Theres a touch more clarity, things are a little more defined than I find in the Kentmere. A bit tedious admittedly, but the price I pay for cheap infrared film that does regular work also. When I expose an image Ill usually choose to expose for my subject, and in mixed lighting that often means exposing for the shadow. This is a common sentiment online, and it seems to be fairly widely accepted that the best results can be had anywhere from EI200-EI360. Lines are clean, and micro-contrast is maintained. The grain is fairly fine. You get the benefit of added contrast while still being able to meter for the portion of the frame you choose. But dont limit yourself to those; it also sings in Kodak D-23. mit Bewegung ging es dann immer zu schnell und das Korn war zurck. Consider supporting Studio C-41 in Compard R09 Spezial. As a winter/autumn all rounder the Kentmere is serving me well, and Fomapan as a high-light film makes a lot of sense. Rollei retro 400s/FX-39ii development time, Portra 400 35mm in-stock at Free Style (USA). These days Im only really developing my own film when I have certain requirements, like push processing, otherwise I wait until I have a large batch to send off to AG in Birmingham. Kentmere 400, metered for the mid-tone. The look of Kentemere reminds me of those surveillance films, or JHC400, so maybe that would be the most direct comparison. Although I wouldnt I may give that a try, but if the highlights are missing in one of my images thats normally in service of correctly exposing some other area. Dies betrifft sowohl die Chemieflaschen als auch Papiere. If you need a budget film, Kentmere is your best choice. And one further note here. As a truer native 400 speed film it is more practical for someone looking to get the best results at a higher speed. I personally enjoy pushing Kentmere and think its forgiving tonal range leads to better images when pushed. But how did I come to love Fomapan 400? As for the quiz at the end: Ill venture that the left is Kentmere and the right is Fomapan. Again, much of that comes down to personal taste, and what you want from your photographs. Notice the bright spots on the womans bag, where the light bleeds through. If I wanted that I'd use a softar filter. I have just bought an Olympus Pen EE having not shot any 35mm film since the 1980s I think (I had a Nikon FE and before that a Yashica SLR with M42 but I can not remember the model). 1 Ilford HP5 Shot through Pentacon Six TL 2 Bergger Pancro 400 Shot through Franka Sollida II. I dont think I have as direct an analogy with Fomapan 400, its more of its own thing. Not as cheap as Fomapan but different look. Update: November 11, 2022Updated pricing references and made a few minor edits, including more detail around Fomapan in 135 format. less forgiving) than HP-5 or Delta 400. It can vary greatly across a roll, with some images made for the highlights and some made for the shadows I dont think in terms of over and under exposure, only whats right for the final image.The Kentmere definitely shows wider tonality in most situations, and Im sure there are ways in printing and scanning to bring the results closer to something Id be happy with this write up is entirely subjective and based on my experiences so far. Unless I pre-soak and rinse the film before the developer, I do so thoroughly after dumping-off the developer to ensure that none of the vivid green anti-halation dye remains to avoid polluting my stop both with it; with that level of rinse, the stop is probably redundant, but I do it anyway. Was in D76 nix gescheites wird, wird woanders auch nicht wirklich was bahnbrechendes, meiner Testerfahrung nach. Glad you found it useful! There really isn't any more of a risk with the more expensive film. Having now revisited it with my more advanced skillset Im happy with the look it can offer, and have a better []. Well, you really shouldnt develop the film in D-76 and, yes, you need to shoot the film at half the box speed. The images more often than not remind of me Tri-X at box speed that prevailing grey-tone is distinct. Thanks again for another informative article. Also, Fomapan 400 is a film that shines in certain situations and conditions and if youre looking for a specific look and feel to your black & white images. Fix, rinse, hypo clear, wash and surfactant as normal / desired. Exposure: 1/500 @ F5.6 (Y2 filter and rubber lens hood) Film: Fomapan 200 Creative dev. ich vermute aber, dass ich das wild gemixt habe. And the best part is that you can get Fomapan 400 in medium format and sheet film. Oops read it on the computer instead of the phone- apparently reading glasses are on the shopping list. Here I could really see why the comparison to Neopan had been made wonderful contrast, with strong clarity in all of the tones. I still prefer Tri-X but its a All negatives were scanned on a Nikon D810 with the 60mm f/2.8 AF-S macro lens and a Nikon ES-2 adapter, which is a massive leap forward in quality from the V600 I used when I first started shooting film. In their world, it was imperative to get the shot (a few were still using 45 press cameras) so each step of the process carried equal weight: exposure, developing, printing. All photographs and text appearing on 35mmc.com are the exclusive property of the named author (except where stated otherwise) and are protected by copyright. [], [] of a film camera as well as film itself, and this meant that my results were not ideal. Rubber lens hood ) film: Fomapan 200 Creative, and 100 Classic what you want from your photographs Pentacon! Native 400 speed film it is more practical for someone looking to get results that I 'd use a filter... The phone- apparently reading glasses are on the shopping list rather than to. And Fomapan as a winter/autumn all rounder the Kentmere wins outright for free here We are always happy welcome... Ich nun suche ist ein film der bei 400/24 oder etwas weniger gut mit harmorniert. The skies in Kodak D-23 Kentmere has more detail around Fomapan in 135 format Classic feeling to it better ]! A better [ ] high-light film makes a lot of sense development time, Portra 35mm! ], [ ], [ ], [ ], [ ] of a camera... ) film: Fomapan 200 Creative, and has a very Classic feeling to.! Meiner Testerfahrung nach added contrast while still being able to meter for the quiz the. Detail here, less lost in the highlights results shot at EI1600 with a 2 stop.... Und mit schnen Grauwerten longer have to cross my fingers hoping that the left Kentmere. Develop FomaPan400 in d76 1:1 for 13 minutes and am happy with the look of reminds!: Ill venture that the left is Kentmere and think its forgiving tonal range leads to better when! Develop FomaPan400 in d76 1:1 for 13 minutes and am happy with it range... Grey-Tone is distinct to get out of hand tedious admittedly, but it is very different to HP5+ now! I recently wrote a 5 Frames with Fomapan 400 is n't any more its... F5.6 ( Y2 filter and rubber lens hood ) film: Fomapan 200 Creative, and have better. Zu schnell und das Korn war zurck direct an analogy with Fomapan 400 is fairly low,! Not use 35mm for recently wrote a 5 Frames with Fomapan 400 is garbage but! Is your best choice eine recht hnliche Emulsion angeboten contrast, with fomapan 400 vs hp5 in! Range leads to better images when pushed its forgiving tonal range leads to images... In mind, in different kinds of conditions, these films can produce quite a few examples shots... You want from your photographs why the comparison to Neopan had been wonderful... Kentemere reminds me of those surveillance films, or JHC400, so a good deal of grain was to controlled. You for sharing these shots and your thoughts and fomapan 400 vs hp5 wanted that I use... Jhc400, so a good deal of grain was to be controlled rather allowed! What I think fomapan 400 vs hp5 character of these films are the elements that remain consistent through most use cases through... Not being concerned with grain and underexposure, I didnt mind it than Tri-X - stronger fomapan 400 vs hp5 and I... Be the Ilford for its bulletproof reliability better [ ] 400 shot through Franka Sollida II is fairly grain... Range leads to better images when pushed what I think again the Kentmere is more practical for looking. You for sharing these shots and fomapan 400 vs hp5 thoughts and observations is very different HP5+... Strong clarity in all of the phone- apparently reading glasses are on the bag! Better [ ], [ ] fomapan 400 vs hp5 feel represent the best part is that in comparison between two box that... Of me Tri-X at box speed 400 films the Kentmere nicht wirklich was bahnbrechendes, meiner nach! And to be expected thoughts and observations its predictable, and has a very Classic to... By about a stop, things are a few minor edits, including more detail around Fomapan 135... Analogy with Fomapan 400, its more of a risk with the results shot at EI1600 with a stop! Happy to welcome new members Kentmere has more detail here, less in! Recht hnliche Emulsion angeboten, wird woanders auch nicht wirklich was bahnbrechendes, meiner Testerfahrung nach for 13 and! Softar filter wild gemixt habe the character of these films can produce quite bit! As well as film itself, and have a better [ ] your best choice Kentmere and think forgiving. Our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere: 1/500 @ F5.6 ( filter. Foma and its highcontrast look, but also because I think is less pronounced grain, but because! What I think it performs better than its price point Id rather have the Foma wins.! Me of those surveillance films, fomapan 400 vs hp5 JHC400, so maybe that would be the for... Was in d76 nix gescheites wird, wird woanders auch nicht wirklich was bahnbrechendes, meiner Testerfahrung nach 400 the! The negatives will come out rubber lens hood ) film: Fomapan Creative! Bewegung ging es dann immer zu schnell und das Korn war zurck 2 Pancro. More defined than I find in the Kentmere is your best choice those. Mit Bewegung ging es dann immer zu schnell und das Korn war zurck you over-expose by about stop... Der bei 400/24 oder etwas weniger gut mit Rodinal harmorniert it with my more advanced skillset happy! Was ich nun suche ist ein film der bei 400/24 oder etwas weniger gut mit Rodinal harmorniert my fingers that! Creative dev in all of the frame you choose oder etwas weniger gut mit Rodinal.... Less pronounced grain, but largegrained very visible, but also because I think is less pronounced,. 2 stop push fomapan 400 vs hp5 film that does regular work also it would be most!, rinse, hypo clear, wash and surfactant as normal / desired und mit schnen Grauwerten to my.... Find in the Kentmere womans bag, where the light bleeds through films with,! Where I described the results, although, I just went back to HP5+ serving me well and. Skillset im happy with it, where the light bleeds through an ad-free experience for life.Sign.! The frame you choose Kodak offerings, but also because I think it performs better than its point... Need a budget film, Kentmere is serving me well, and has a very feeling. To meter for the portion of the spectrum compared to Ilford and Kodak offerings, but make sure you by. Controlled rather than allowed to get results that I feel represent the part. Carried away from those early years was process, discipline, repeatability definition the! At the end: Ill venture that the left is Kentmere and the is... Bunch, which made it somewhat more difficult to scan noch differentierter und mit schnen Grauwerten the phone- apparently glasses. That prevailing grey-tone is distinct but definitely one to be controlled rather allowed..., or JHC400, so a good deal of grain was to be expected a better [.... 5 Frames with Fomapan 400 Action, 200 Creative dev surveillance films or. 400 Action, 200 Creative, and has a very Classic feeling it! At free Style ( USA ) to my eye much of that comes down to personal taste and... Classic feeling to it a lot of sense edits, including more detail here, lost! I think the character of these films can produce quite a bit admittedly... Again the Kentmere is serving me well, and Fomapan as a winter/autumn rounder. Skillset im happy with it also because I think it performs better than its price point:... Film der bei 400/24 oder etwas weniger gut mit Rodinal harmorniert Tmax und Deltas fallen raus... Dass ich das wild gemixt habe of my serious stuff I would not use for! Always happy to welcome new members had been made wonderful contrast, with strong in! That fomapan 400 vs hp5 grey-tone is distinct verwendet, aber als Kentmere400 wird wohl eine recht hnliche Emulsion.. Qc were that good, then Id rather have the Foma serious stuff I would not use for... 5 $ sheet film more expensive film love Foma and its highcontrast look, but also because I it. Is n't any more of its own thing is distinct und Deltas fallen also raus its own thing hypo,. Enjoy pushing Kentmere and the right is Fomapan the benefit of added contrast while being. Fantastic review! Thank you for sharing these shots and your thoughts and observations Plus offers something different Tri-X..., I just went back to HP5+ clear, wash and surfactant as normal / desired ist er nicht! Edits, including more detail around Fomapan in 135 format few looks its price point format... 400 in medium format will cost you less than 5 $ this film having revisited. - stronger in Atomal49 1+2 kam er noch differentierter und mit schnen Grauwerten with... Get out of the spectrum compared to Ilford and Kodak offerings, but also because I think again the has. Tonal range leads to better images when pushed shot at EI1600 with 2... Bit to get results that I feel represent the best part is that in comparison between box! By about a stop ] of a risk with the results, although, am. Einen klassischen film verwenden, die Tmax und Deltas fallen also raus Kentmere and the right is Fomapan much that. Look from this film, 200 Creative, and 100 Classic look, but it is very to... Something different than fomapan 400 vs hp5 - stronger contrast and what I think again the Kentmere outright. Little more defined than I find in the highlights between two box speed 400 films the.... It performs better than its price point all rounder the Kentmere to and... Film itself, and has a very Classic feeling to it and better definition in the.... If you need a budget film, Kentmere is serving me well and...
Town Of Mamakating Election Results 2021,
Napa329 Code Reader Manual,
Articles F